Luck vs. Wlison: does the ring change anything?

Not this again.

For years, Colt fans watched Peyton Manning get passed over for Tom Brady on the "who's the better quarterback?" discussion, no pun intended … despite playing on a conservative, otherwise-mediocre team with (perhaps) two or three guys on defense that we'll remember ten years from now. I won't even get into this.

Mike Wells, via ESPN.com, has just compared Andrew Luck and Russell Wilson in the exact some way. Granted, he's pro-Luck … but holy hell why is this happening please make it stop.

“Wilson really hasn’t played all that well over the last month and a half or so and they were still winning,” Williamson said. “He has a great roster around him. And the Seahawks are smart, they don’t ask him to do a ton. Even [Sunday], he played well, but he wasn’t the best player on the field. For the Colts to win, Luck has to be the best player on the field, and he often is.” 

I won't even discuss this. Did you watch the Superbowl? Wilson didn't even need to show up! Sigh. Anyway, I'm not getting into this. Instead, I'm praying Indy gets a half-decent defense to compliment Luck next season.

Quantcast